NETEC Resource Library

Environmental Contact and Self-contact Patterns of Healthcare Workers: Implications for Infection Prevention and Control

Item

Click for External Resource*


Click to read full article*


*The link above may share a zip file (.zip) hosted on repository.netecweb.org. Zip files will download automatically.
*All other links are external and will open in a new window. If you click an external link, you are leaving the NETEC site, and we do not maintain, review, or endorse these materials. See our terms of use.


Item Type

Publication

Terms of Use

By accessing these materials you are agreeing to our terms of use, which may be found here: Terms of Use.

Share this page:

Was this resource helpful?


Title

Environmental Contact and Self-contact Patterns of Healthcare Workers: Implications for Infection Prevention and Control

Description

Respiratory viruses on fomites can be transferred to sites susceptible to infection via contact by hands or other fomites.

Source

Phan, Linh T., Dayana Maita, Donna C. Mortiz, Susan C. Bleasdale, and Rachael M. Jones.

Date

2019-10-01

Citation

Phan, Linh T., Dayana Maita, Donna C. Mortiz, Susan C. Bleasdale, and Rachael M. Jones. 2019. "Environmental Contact and Self-contact Patterns of Healthcare Workers: Implications for Infection Prevention and Control." Clinical Infectious Diseases 69 (Supplement_3):S178-S84.

Abstract

Abstract

Background

Respiratory viruses on fomites can be transferred to sites susceptible to infection via contact by hands or other fomites.

Methods

Care for hospitalized patients with viral respiratory infections was observed in the patient room for 3-hour periods at an acute care academic medical center for over a 2 year period. One trained observer recorded the healthcare activities performed, contacts with fomites, and self-contacts made by healthcare workers (HCWs), while another observer recorded fomite contacts of patients during the encounter using predefined checklists.

Results

The surface contacted by HCWs during the majority of visits was the patient (90%). Environmental surfaces contacted by HCWs frequently during healthcare activities included the tray table (48%), bed surface (41%), bed rail (41%), computer station (37%), and intravenous pole (32%). HCWs touched their own torso and mask in 32% and 29% of the visits, respectively. HCWs’ self-contacts differed significantly among HCW job roles, with providers and respiratory therapists contacting themselves significantly more times than nurses and nurse technicians (P < .05). When HCWs performed only 1 care activity, there were significant differences in the number of patient contacts and self-contacts that HCWs made during performance of multiple care activities (P < .05).

Conclusions

HCWs regularly contact environmental surfaces, patients, and themselves while providing care to patients with infectious diseases, varying among care activities and HCW job roles. These contacts may facilitate the transmission of infection to HCWs and susceptible patients.

Accessibility

Online with journal subscription (Oxford Academic)

Collection