Developing a Rapid Response Single IRB Model for Conducting Research During a Public Health Emergency
Elemento
Click for External Resource*
Click to read full article*
*The link above may share a zip file (.zip) hosted on repository.netecweb.org. Zip files will download automatically.
*All other links are external and will open in a new window. If you click an external link, you are leaving the NETEC site, and we do not maintain, review, or endorse these materials. See our terms of use.
Item Type
PublicaciónTerms of Use
By accessing these materials you are agreeing to our terms of use, which may be found here: Terms of Use.
Título
Developing a Rapid Response Single IRB Model for Conducting Research During a Public Health Emergency
Materia
Descripción
Research is foundational for evidence-based management of patients. Clinical research, however, takes time to plan, conduct, and disseminate—a luxury that is rarely available during a public health emergency. The University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) developed a single institutional review board (IRB), with a vision to establish a rapid review resource for a network focused on clinical research of emerging pathogens in the United States.
Fecha
2022-05-31
Tipo
Citación
Lowe, A. E., C. Kraft, M. G. Kortepeter, K. F. Hansen, K. Sanger, A. Johnson, J. D. Grein, J. Martin, R. Rousselle, J. A. Garland, J. Spotts, J. J. Lowe, L. M. Sauer, C. J. Kratochvil, and B. G. Gordon. 2022. "Developing a Rapid Response Single IRB Model for Conducting Research During a Public Health Emergency." Health Secur 20 (S1):S60-s70. doi: 10.1089/hs.2021.0181.
Resumen
Research is foundational for evidence-based management of patients. Clinical research, however, takes time to plan, conduct, and disseminate—a luxury that is rarely available during a public health emergency. The University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) developed a single institutional review board (IRB), with a vision to establish a rapid review resource for a network focused on clinical research of emerging pathogens in the United States. A core aspect of successful initiation of research during a pandemic or epidemic is the ability to operationalize an approach for rapid ethical review of human subject research and conduct those reviews at multiple sites—without losing any of the substantive aspects of ethics review. This process must be cultivated in anticipation of a public health emergency. US guidance for operationalizing IRB review for multisite research in a public health emergency is not well studied and processes are not well established. UNMC sought to address operational gaps and identify the unique procedural needs of rapid response single IRB (RR-sIRB) review of multisite research by conducting a series of preparedness exercises to develop and test the RR-sIRB model. For decades, emergency responder, healthcare, and public health organizations have conducted emergency preparedness exercises to test requirements for emergency response. In this article, we describe 2 types of simulation exercises conducted by UNMC: workshops and tabletops. This effort represents a unique use of emergency preparedness exercises to develop, refine, and test rapid review functions for an sIRB and to validate readiness of regulatory research processes. Such processes are crucial for conducting rapid, ethical, and sound clinical research in public health emergencies.
Accesibilidad
Open Access on journal site
Was this resource helpful?