NETEC Resource Library

Common Behaviors and Faults When Doffing Personal Protective Equipment for Patients With Serious Communicable Diseases

Item

Click for External Resource*


Click to read full article*


*The link above may share a zip file (.zip) hosted on repository.netecweb.org. Zip files will download automatically.
*All other links are external and will open in a new window. If you click an external link, you are leaving the NETEC site, and we do not maintain, review, or endorse these materials. See our terms of use.


Item Type

Publication

Terms of Use

By accessing these materials you are agreeing to our terms of use, which may be found here: Terms of Use.

Was this resource helpful?


Title

Common Behaviors and Faults When Doffing Personal Protective Equipment for Patients With Serious Communicable Diseases

Description

The safe removal of personal protective equipment (PPE) can limit transmission of serious communicable diseases, but this process poses challenges to healthcare workers (HCWs).

Source

Mumma, Joel M., Francis T. Durso, Lisa M. Casanova, Kimberly Erukunuakpor, Colleen S. Kraft, Susan M. Ray, Andi L. Shane, Victoria L. Walsh, Puja Y. Shah, Craig Zimring, Jennifer DuBose, and Jesse T. Jacob.

Date

2019-10-01

Citation

Mumma, Joel M., Francis T. Durso, Lisa M. Casanova, Kimberly Erukunuakpor, Colleen S. Kraft, Susan M. Ray, Andi L. Shane, Victoria L. Walsh, Puja Y. Shah, Craig Zimring, Jennifer DuBose, and Jesse T. Jacob. 2019. "Common Behaviors and Faults When Doffing Personal Protective Equipment for Patients With Serious Communicable Diseases." Clinical Infectious Diseases 69 (Supplement_3):S214-S20.

Abstract

Abstract

Background

The safe removal of personal protective equipment (PPE) can limit transmission of serious communicable diseases, but this process poses challenges to healthcare workers (HCWs).

Methods

We observed 41 HCWs across 4 Ebola treatment centers in Georgia doffing PPE for simulated patients with serious communicable diseases. Using human factors methodologies, we obtained the details, sequences, and durations of doffing steps; identified the ways each step can fail (failure modes [FMs]); quantified the riskiness of FMs; and characterized the workload of doffing steps.

Results

Eight doffing steps were common to all hospitals—removal of boot covers, gloves (outer and inner pairs), the outermost garment, the powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) hood, and the PAPR helmet assembly; repeated hand hygiene (eg, with hand sanitizer); and a final handwashing with soap and water. Across hospitals, we identified 256 FMs during the common doffing steps, 61 of which comprised 19 common FMs. Most of these common FMs were above average in their riskiness at each hospital. At all hospitals, hand hygiene, removal of the outermost garment, and removal of boot covers were above average in their overall riskiness. Measurements of workload revealed that doffing steps were often mentally demanding, and this facet of workload correlated most strongly with the effortfulness of a doffing step.

Conclusions

We systematically identified common points of concern in protocols for doffing high-level PPE. Addressing FMs related to hand hygiene and the removal of the outermost garment, boot covers, and PAPR hood could improve HCW safety when doffing high-level PPE.

We identified ways that doffing protocols for high-level personal protective equipment may fail to protect healthcare workers. Hand hygiene, removing the outermost garment, boot covers, and respirator hood harbored the greatest risk and failed in similar ways across different hospitals.

Accessibility

Online with journal subscription (Oxford Academic).

Collection